Archive for

Frito-Lay leaves NGO tongue-tied

Frito-Lay gets a nice puff piece from the NYT on an energy efficient plant, and a rep from the Rocky Mountain Institute is caught flat-footed.  NGOs are much better in attack than react mode. 

Gap Child Labor: II — The Plan

The Gap came out with specifics on stopping child labor practices in India, including a $200K grant and six month suspension of a vendor.

NYT story  Gap Holding Statement  Marka Hansen letter

Victims of Colombia conflict sue Chiquita

Victims of Colombia’s bloody civil conflict filed an almost $8 billion lawsuit against the U.S. banana importer Chiquita Brands International on Wednesday for making payments to a paramilitary group responsible for thousands of killings. http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/5302660.html

Pot-pie production resumes after recall

The pot pies have been linked to at least 272 cases of salmonella in 35 states.

Beijing 2008: Olympics for Activists, NGOs

Whether its recalled toys, Darfur, Tibet,  the environment, or a half dozen other issues, the Beijing Olympics represent a target-rich environment for NGOs and activist groups who will be focusing their ire at corporate sponsors. 

No doubt PR reps at Coke, Adidas, Visa, Panasonic, GE and McDonalds have had a long run-up to create stories about cooperative initiatives.  Interest groups won’t make much hay as they are likely to compete for attention rather than coalesce around one issue.   Look for media to be blase about protests as a result. 

From the Wall Street Journal (subscription required)

Already, some activist groups say they are broadening
their attention from attacking China’s government to targeting Olympic
sponsors.

[General Electric wind turbines at farms outside Beijing will supply power to Olympic venues.]
General Electric wind turbines at farms outside Beijing will supply power to Olympic venues.

In letters sent last month to Olympic sponsors, Robert
Ménard, secretary-general of Reporters Without Borders, a Paris-based
group promoting global press freedom, warned: "We plan to publicly
challenge those companies that are participants in the Beijing Games
without doing anything in the area of human rights. We will address
their shareholders, their clients and the general public."

Next week, Olympic Dream for Darfur, a New York-based
activist group protesting China’s support for the armed conflict in
Sudan, plans to release a report grading 19 Olympic corporate sponsors
on their attempts to influence the Chinese government. (The group gave
passing grades to only a few sponsors.) China has been under pressure
because it has large investments in Sudan and is perceived to be using
its influence to prevent United Nations intervention in the conflict.

The Darfur activists are a force to be reckoned with:
In the last year, pressure from such groups has prompted some 20 U.S.
states and several universities, including Harvard, to divest billions
of dollars from companies linked to Sudan. "This will only get more
uncomfortable for organizers and sponsors," says Jill Savitt, the
group’s director.

|